The bonding code is supposed to tag flows two ways:

    - According to the chosen bond slave, to make it easy to invalidate all
      of the flows assigned to a given slave.

    - According to the hash value for a flow, to make it easy to invalidate
      all of the flows that hash into the same bucket.

However, the code wasn't actually applying the hash-based tags.  This
meant that rebalancing didn't take effect immediately, and so after
rebalancing we could get log messages like this:

   inconsistency in subfacet (actions were: 5) (correct actions: 4)

specifying some flow that was moved by the rebalance.

This commit fixes the problem by applying the hash-based tags.

Bug #12847.
Reported-by: Pratap Reddy <pre...@nicira.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
---
 AUTHORS    |    1 +
 lib/bond.c |   10 ++++++----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS
index dee8931..28dc742 100644
--- a/AUTHORS
+++ b/AUTHORS
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ Paulo Cravero           pcrav...@as2594.net
 Peter Balland           pe...@nicira.com
 Peter Phaal             peter.ph...@inmon.com
 Prabina Pattnaik        prabina.pattn...@nechclst.in
+Pratap Reddy            pre...@nicira.com
 Ralf Heiringhoff        r...@frosty-geek.net
 Ram Jothikumar          rjothiku...@nicira.com
 Ramana Reddy            gtvrre...@gmail.com
diff --git a/lib/bond.c b/lib/bond.c
index 7178416..77812ed 100644
--- a/lib/bond.c
+++ b/lib/bond.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static struct bond_entry *lookup_bond_entry(const struct 
bond *,
 static tag_type bond_get_active_slave_tag(const struct bond *);
 static struct bond_slave *choose_output_slave(const struct bond *,
                                               const struct flow *,
-                                              uint16_t vlan);
+                                              uint16_t vlan, tag_type *tags);
 static void bond_update_fake_slave_stats(struct bond *);
 
 /* Attempts to parse 's' as the name of a bond balancing mode.  If successful,
@@ -523,13 +523,14 @@ bond_compose_learning_packet(struct bond *bond,
 {
     struct bond_slave *slave;
     struct ofpbuf *packet;
+    tag_type tags = 0;
     struct flow flow;
 
     assert(may_send_learning_packets(bond));
 
     memset(&flow, 0, sizeof flow);
     memcpy(flow.dl_src, eth_src, ETH_ADDR_LEN);
-    slave = choose_output_slave(bond, &flow, vlan);
+    slave = choose_output_slave(bond, &flow, vlan, &tags);
 
     packet = ofpbuf_new(0);
     compose_rarp(packet, eth_src);
@@ -637,7 +638,7 @@ void *
 bond_choose_output_slave(struct bond *bond, const struct flow *flow,
                          uint16_t vlan, tag_type *tags)
 {
-    struct bond_slave *slave = choose_output_slave(bond, flow, vlan);
+    struct bond_slave *slave = choose_output_slave(bond, flow, vlan, tags);
     if (slave) {
         *tags |= bond->balance == BM_STABLE ? bond->stb_tag : slave->tag;
         return slave->aux;
@@ -1405,7 +1406,7 @@ choose_stb_slave(const struct bond *bond, uint32_t 
flow_hash)
 
 static struct bond_slave *
 choose_output_slave(const struct bond *bond, const struct flow *flow,
-                    uint16_t vlan)
+                    uint16_t vlan, tag_type *tags)
 {
     struct bond_entry *e;
 
@@ -1441,6 +1442,7 @@ choose_output_slave(const struct bond *bond, const struct 
flow *flow,
             }
             e->tag = tag_create_random();
         }
+        *tags |= e->tag;
         return e->slave;
 
     default:
-- 
1.7.2.5

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to