On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:53:52PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > Perhaps when (if?) someone submits another ofproto provider to master, > > we can figure out what best suits the set of providers as a whole. > > Yah it's hard to get the abstraction right when we only have deep > knowledge of one implementation. Hopefully a significant open source > secondary implementation will pop up and we will learn a lot from it.
Perhaps someone could write a provider for, for example, the Intel FM2112 chip, for which full register-level specs are published. But I'm not holding my breath. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
