On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> Working through symlinks is undesirable when one can avoid it.
>
> The Debian packaging still sets up the symlinks for compatibility with
> existing software that expects the database to be in /etc/openvswitch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> ---
> debian/rules | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
> index 51a2e51..88a9a28 100755
> --- a/debian/rules
> +++ b/debian/rules
> @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ configure-stamp:
> cd _debian && ( \
> test -e Makefile || \
> ../configure --prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var
> --enable-ssl \
> - --sysconfdir=/etc CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" \
> - $(DATAPATH_CONFIGURE_OPTS))
> + --sysconfdir=/etc
> --with-dbdir=/var/lib/openvswitch \
> + CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" $(DATAPATH_CONFIGURE_OPTS))
>
Do we still need to create those symlinks in /etc/openvswitch after
you configure OVS binaries to use /var/lib/openvswitch directly? Who
is going to use them?
touch configure-stamp
>
> #Architecture
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
