On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:16:34PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > As the structures uses for encoding and decoding statistics request and > reply messages are largely the same between OpenFlow 1.1 and 1.2 it seems > to make sense to use OFPT11_STATS_{REQUEST,REPLY} for OpenFlow 1.2. > > This patch prepares the decode path. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au>
You're right, this doesn't need to be limited to OF1.1. I don't expect that future OpenFlow versions will mess with this numbering again, so I decided to fold the following into the first patch of my of1.1 series instead: diff --git a/lib/ofp-msgs.c b/lib/ofp-msgs.c index 479f768..1d11e7f 100644 --- a/lib/ofp-msgs.c +++ b/lib/ofp-msgs.c @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ ofphdrs_decode(struct ofphdrs *hdrs, return OFPERR_OFPBRC_BAD_VENDOR; } } - } else if (hdrs->version == OFP11_VERSION + } else if (hdrs->version != OFP10_VERSION && (hdrs->type == OFPT11_STATS_REQUEST || hdrs->type == OFPT11_STATS_REPLY)) { const struct ofp11_stats_msg *osm; @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ ofphdrs_len(const struct ofphdrs *hdrs) ? sizeof(struct nicira10_stats_msg) : sizeof(struct ofp_stats_msg)); } - } else if (hdrs->version == OFP11_VERSION) { + } else { if (hdrs->type == OFPT11_STATS_REQUEST || hdrs->type == OFPT11_STATS_REPLY) { return (hdrs->stat == OFPST_VENDOR @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ ofpraw_put__(enum ofpraw raw, uint8_t version, ovs_be32 xid, NOT_REACHED(); } } - } else if (version == OFP11_VERSION + } else if (version != OFP10_VERSION && (hdrs->type == OFPT11_STATS_REQUEST || hdrs->type == OFPT11_STATS_REPLY)) { struct ofp11_stats_msg *osm = buf->l2; _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev