On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 09:26:49AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 04:58:09PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:48:52PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > This is an alternative proposal to the OXM VLAN patches that > > > Simon sent earlier beginning here: > > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-July/019329.html > > > > > > Instead of trying to make single metaflow fields look like both > > > OF1.0 and OF1.2, it uses separate ones for each version. > > > > This looks good to me. Trying to get the same calls to work for both > > OF1.0 and OF1.2 was tricky at best. > > > > Acked-by: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> > > Thanks. I added that to the first three patches, I didn't add it to > the last four since it seemed odd for you to ack your own patches ;-) > > Now that I carefully compare the table in DESIGN against the test > added in patch 6, though, I see some minor discrepancies. None of > them worry me much so I think I'm going to push this series and then > fix up those discrepancies later.
Thanks. I'll be interested to see what the discrepancies are. I think this truly must be the most bothersome 4 bytes in networking. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
