On 28 June 2012 23:15, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > The route-table implementation is definitely not portable, but I don't > think there's anything in the interface that can't be implemented in > FreeBSD. One proper solution, then, would be to add an implementation > that works in FreeBSD. I'd certainly take such an implementation.
It looks like the public interfaces in route-table (other than glue) are just route_table_get_ifindex and route_table_get_name, which should be straightforward to implement for FreeBSD. I will take a look at this - probably implementing route-table-bsd.[ch]. It looks like route-table is implemented only for IPv4 right now? If it does go away perhaps that will save the effort of creating a v6 interface. -Ed _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
