On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 01:40:19PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:27:51PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:25:19AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:32:14AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > "enum ofperr" is clearer than "int".
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au>
> > 
> > Thanks for all the reviews.  I pushed patches 1 through 10 to master.
> > I'll wait for more reviews (and possibly do some more work on the
> > remaining commits) before I push more patches.
> 
> Thanks. I am reasonably comfortable with 1-15 at this point,
> but I'm happy with a more cautious approach too.

In particular I didn't see a followup to #12, so I'm not sure whether
you read it.  That's also the biggest change and the most likely to be
wrong, so I'll probably seek a second review on it in any case.

Thanks,

Ben.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to