Looks good to me.

I wasn't volunteering that we'd change the default.  There was a suggestion 
that OpenFlow 1.0.1 forbid standalone support.  I said that we would most 
likely not follow that, since not only do we support that mode, it's our 
default.  I suggested we might be open to changing the default, but I'd check 
to see what other's thought.

--Justin


On May 14, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:

> I pushed this commit.  I'm still waiting for feedback on the second
> one.
> 
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:17:04PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> Looks good.
>> 
>> In the line above your change, should we just state what the default
>> is?  I remember we used to not want to put OVS's defaults into the
>> OVSDB spec.  However, we now do put our defaults in, so I think it
>> would be clearer if we just go ahead and do it for this one, too.
>> 
>> --Justin
>> 
>> 
>> On May 10, 2012, at 10:11 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> 
>>> EXT-186.
>>> Reported-by: Rob Sherwood <rob.sherw...@bigswitch.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
>>> ---
>>> AUTHORS              |    1 +
>>> vswitchd/vswitch.xml |    6 ++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS
>>> index 89472b3..2ff4e2d 100644
>>> --- a/AUTHORS
>>> +++ b/AUTHORS
>>> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ Peter Balland           pe...@nicira.com
>>> Peter Phaal             peter.ph...@inmon.com
>>> Ram Jothikumar          rjothiku...@nicira.com
>>> Ramana Reddy            gtvrre...@gmail.com
>>> +Rob Sherwood            rob.sherw...@bigswitch.com
>>> Roger Leigh             rle...@codelibre.net
>>> Rogério Vinhal Nunes
>>> Sean Brady              sbr...@gtfservices.com
>>> diff --git a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml
>>> index b9b7b97..308af51 100644
>>> --- a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml
>>> +++ b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml
>>> @@ -410,6 +410,12 @@
>>>        </dl>
>>>        </p>
>>>        <p>If this value is unset, the default is 
>>> implementation-specific.</p>
>>> +        <p>
>>> +          The <code>standalone</code> mode can create forwarding loops on a
>>> +          bridge that has more than one uplink port unless STP is enabled. 
>>>  To
>>> +          avoid loops on such a bridge, configure <code>secure</code> mode 
>>> or
>>> +          enable STP (see <ref column="stp_enable"/>).
>>> +        </p>
>>>        <p>When more than one controller is configured,
>>>        <ref column="fail_mode"/> is considered only when none of the
>>>        configured controllers can be contacted.</p>
>>> -- 
>>> 1.7.2.5
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dev mailing list
>>> dev@openvswitch.org
>>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>> 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to