On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 01:29:08PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> wrote: > > It seems to me that some changes are needed to the tunneling core code, > > in particular handle_offloads(), to allow GSO skbs to be passed > > unsegmented to STT. Perhaps a new mutable->flags flag is in order? > > I agree that there definitely needs to be additional information given > to the tunneling core to enable it to decide whether or not to emulate > offloads. However, I think the information belongs in tnl_ops instead > of mutable->flags since it is shared by all tunnels of a given type.
Thanks, I will look into that. At this point I am thinking of a single flag to indicate that the protocol handler is able to handle GSO skbs. I'll see about preparing a patch to implement that. But perhaps a single flag is insufficient for some cases? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
