On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Ansis Atteka <aatt...@nicira.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/vswitchd/bridge.c b/vswitchd/bridge.c
>> index 6449333..e1a663d 100644
>> --- a/vswitchd/bridge.c
>> +++ b/vswitchd/bridge.c
>> @@ -1199,6 +1199,11 @@ bridge_add_ofproto_ports(struct bridge *br)
>> /* We already reported a related error, don't bother
>> * duplicating it. */
>> }
>> + if (!ofproto_port_query_by_name(br->ofproto, port->name,
>> +
>> &ofproto_port)) {
>> + ofproto_port_del(br->ofproto, ofproto_port.ofp_port);
>> + ofproto_port_destroy(&ofproto_port);
>> + }
>
> RFC: Not sure if it would have been more correctly to use
> dpif_linux_port_del directly here? Perhaps someone can
> clarify?
I think using the ofproto functions are correct - the dpif_linux
functions are several layers down.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
