On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:37:47PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > The intention is that, as each OpenFlow 1.1 feature is added to Open > vSwitch, the corresponding protocol definitions will be broken up this way: > > - Definitions that are the same in OF1.0 and OF1.1 will retain the "OFP" > or "ofp" prefix and move to openflow-common.h. > > - Definitions that are specific to OF1.0 will be renamed with an "OFP10" > or "ofp10" prefix and stay in openflow-1.0.h. > > - Definitions that are specific to OF1.1 will be renamed with an "OFP11" > or "ofp11" prefix and move to openflow-1.1.h.
I am wondering how a hypothetical definition that is shared by OF1.1 and OF1.2 but not OF1.0 might be shared. It may or may not conflict with a OF1.0 definition. I don't have anything in particular in mind, but as more OF versions are added it seems like a plausible scenario. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
