Absolutely, will do so.
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Friday, February 17, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Jesse Gross wrote: > If the behavior that you're looking for is actually the same as vxlan > then you might want to help out the guys who are planning on working > on it. There's some discussion here: > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-February/014685.html > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <d...@midokura.com > (mailto:d...@midokura.com)> wrote: > > Understood, thanks! > > > > > > > > On Thursday, February 16, 2012, Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com > > (mailto:jpet...@nicira.com)> wrote: > > > On Feb 15, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu wrote: > > > > > > > That is true, such usage would definitely not be standard compliant. > > > > > > > > Incidentally, are OVS CAPWAP tunnels actually being used to connect to > > > > non-OVS endpoints? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I know of deployments that use OVS to communicate with non-OVS > > > endpoints using CAPWAP. > > > > > > --Justin
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
