On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:35, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:12:25PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote: >> Bond rebalances come with a risk of packet reordering which some >> users may find unacceptable. >> >> Requested-by: Ben Basler <bbas...@nicira.com> >> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com> > > Add a NEWS item?
done. > > s/an load balanced/a load balanced/ in vswitch.xml Ben Basler made an offline suggestion about rewording this a bit as well which will be included in a forthcoming revision. > I have a very small worry that someone might already set the rebalance > interval to 0, expecting to get the minimum rebalancing interval, and > that this would change behavior to turn off rebalancing. But that > seems unlikely, so I guess it's fine. I agree it's a bit awkward. We have been for some time documenting that the minimum value is 1000. Any other configurations have undefined behavior in this context. At any rate, it doesn't worry me too much. C'est la vie. I'll send out an incremental shortly. Ethan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
