On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:10:41AM -0500, Brian Haley wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 07:01 PM, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
> > --- a/lib/packets.h
> > +++ b/lib/packets.h
> > @@ -464,4 +464,14 @@ void *snap_compose(struct ofpbuf *, const uint8_t
> > eth_dst[ETH_ADDR_LEN],
> > const uint8_t eth_src[ETH_ADDR_LEN],
> > unsigned int oui, uint16_t snap_type, size_t size);
> >
> > +static inline int ipv6_addr_is_zero(const struct in6_addr *addr)
> > +{
> > + const uint32_t *a = (const uint32_t *)&addr->s6_addr[0];
> > + int i, ret = 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> > + ret += a[i];
> > + }
> > + return !ret;
> > +}
>
> There's already an IN6_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED macro defined in in.h, which every
> platform should have for RFC compliance. [...]
Thanks. I didn't know about that one.
Pravin, let's use IN6_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED instead of adding a new
function.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
