> You could simplify further by making pktbuf_save() take a pointer and
> length instead of a pktbuf.

That's a good idea.  I'll write up another patch and insert it before this one.

The changes are getting complex enough that I intend to resend the
entire series before finally merging it btw.

EThan


>
> I see that pktbuf_save() should also start allocating more headroom
> for the ofpbufs it creates (later on in this series).  Either that, or
> allocate no headroom at all based on the argument that packets that
> have already gone to the controller are probably not going to go back
> to the controller a second time.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to