On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:08:07PM +0900, Jari Sundell wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 06:28:17PM +0900, Jari Sundell wrote: > >> A while ago whitelisting of some pathnames were made for controller > >> communication using unix sockets, however these are tied to the > >> bridge/switch name. Afaict, that makes it difficult for a single > >> controller to receive connections from multiple switches. > > > > Why? ?Can't the controller just listen on multiple sockets? > > This assume the controller knows apriori what switches are going to be > connecting and that we have an easy way of telling the controller to > make new sockets. While it can be worked around it with multiple > sockets that would make what should be a relatively straightforward > design unnecessarily complex.
OK. Send a patch. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
