> You mean, if the flow table attempts to output to the splinter that it > came in on? Yeah, we don't do anything about that, and you'd end up > sending the packet out the in-port. The splinters currently show up > via OpenFlow. I'd rather hide them, but I didn't do the required work > or even scope it out.
I just suppose I'm a bit worried about accidentally causing a loop because controllers will assume that it's not possible. If you think it's alright, I'm fine with it for now. I haven't looked at the incremental. Your comments on the review seem fine to me so go ahead and merge it when you're ready. Ethan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
