On 11/23/2011 5:44 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 13:55 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> Currently thinking about it. I was also waiting Tom Herbert BQL patches. > > Excellent. I can test when you have something. > >> Several people are interested, and John Fastabend told me he plans to : >> >> (1) rcu'ify classifiers/actions as needed > > Makes sense in most cases. If you have a lot of flow setup/teardown > it may harm.
We could have a CONFIG option to always do locking in some cases if thats not too ugly. > Another one - but dont see how much you can do about this; useful > when you want to share state (eg multiple flows being policed > by a single rate meter); > An action could be shared across multiple policies i.e you can > have: > match1, action foo instance 1, action bar instance 3 > match2, action bar instance3 > match3, .... > This could would mean a lock contended across cpus when different > flows hitting match1/2 show up on different cpus. > >> (2) add flag to drop qdisc lock on simple or hw qdiscs > > Where does config for the hardware happen from? > I assume you mean something like setup_tc() which we have today to call into into the driver at qdisc create time. This happens with the RTNL held. I don't see any reason not to also call into the hardware on qdisc_change() I just haven't done it yet. Although I'm pretty sure we don't want to add a new ndo_ops ever time we have some hardware feature we want to expose. Assuming there are more than 1 or 2 hw features. So maybe we could convert to something more generic. A setup_qos() call that passes an skb with nl attributes. Is that what you were asking? >> (3) mq and mqprio call root qdisc and run a pass over classifiers >> actions possibly resetting queue_mapping. > > > It seems to make sense - but I will wait and see to have better > understanding. One of the problems this resolves is not being able to call the classifier-actions until after the queue is already selected. At this point you can't send it to a higher/lower priority queue. I'm traveling for a couple days, but I'll try to get some actual patches out next week to illustrate this. Thanks, John > > cheers, > jamal > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev