On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 05:41:28PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > The assert() statement in unixctl_command_register() implies that it is > intended to be idempotent but inserting the same name and callback twice > would fail because: > > * The callback is not stored directly in the hash, rather it the > cb element of a struct unixctl_command which is stored in the hash. > > * Insertion would be attempted even if the entry was already present. > > --- > > Lightly tested against 1.2.1 but targeted for master
Thanks, pushed to master. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
