On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:38:51PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > I guess that this will need reconsideration after the "encap" series, > > so I guess there's no point in a detailed response right now--let me > > know if you disagree. > > I agree that most of this patch has been overcome by events. I think > there are a few useful things here that aren't addressed by the latest > patch series though: > * Packets with invalid vlan headers shouldn't be dropped (maybe this > is another rule, that invalid protocol headers should never drop the > packet?). > * I think that if the EtherType is 0x8100 then we should expect a > vlan attribute which may be an empty one, similar to other L3 > protocols.
OK, do you want to address that or do you want me to do it? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
