On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:09:30PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: >> Otherwise, the incremental looks good. However, I realized that there >> is one more issue: when we pass up the flow key for UDP GSO packets, >> they will all reflect the first fragment and not the later packets. > > Hmm, good point. > > Here's a build-tested-only try at this. It needs testing and comments, > at least. Is it on the right track?
It looks good to me (actually I think the new separation is much cleaner even independent of this change). For the whole thing then: Acked-by: Jesse Gross <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
