> A different approach, that seems to me more conventional, would be for > nln_notifier_register() to allocate the struct nln_notifier and return > it as a pointer (probably through a struct nln_notifier ** parameter). > Then nln_notifier_unregister() would just ignore a null pointer. If > we do it this way, then the definition of struct nln_notifier can be > moved into netlink-notifier.c.
I replaced this patch with the "notifiers" series. Ethan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
