On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:37:16PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > --- > I've applied the following incremental to the patch.
I think you might as well just set "eth = p->l2;". I don't see how it could end up being NULL if ccm is non-NULL. Otherwise seems reasonable. Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
