OK. I don't understand your second sentence though.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 04:43:11PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > I'm fine with ditching this patch. Ifaces aren't deleted that option > so the flush is fine. > > Ethan > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think that revalidation here is redundant with calling > > bridge_flush(). ?If you trace through that function's effects, you can > > see that it eventually causes every facet to be revalidated. > > > > I don't know why we do other explicit revalidation here. ?I guess that > > I didn't realize that it wasn't necessary. > > > > If we can actually get rid of the flush, that would be awesome, but > > that would take a more careful audit. > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
