On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote:
>> Currently we explicitly zero out each of the fields in the OVS_CB for
>> executed packets.  However, it seems simpler and more robust to just
>> memset the whole thing to zero.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com>
>
> Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
>
> I don't know whether it's clearer to write packet->cb or OVS_CB(packet)
> as the target of the memset.

I like OVS_CB(packet) a bit better, so I made that change and pushed.

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_openvswitch.org

Reply via email to