On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: >> Currently we explicitly zero out each of the fields in the OVS_CB for >> executed packets. However, it seems simpler and more robust to just >> memset the whole thing to zero. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> > > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> > > I don't know whether it's clearer to write packet->cb or OVS_CB(packet) > as the target of the memset.
I like OVS_CB(packet) a bit better, so I made that change and pushed. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_openvswitch.org