On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Andrew Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm mimicking RPM's convention for expressing shared library dependencies in > terms of the library names rather than the packages in which they reside. > Obviously that doesn't translate literally to the kernel, but I thought it > would be recognizable to people familiar with RPM deps on shared libraries.
OK, that sounds good to me. I didn't know about that convention. I'm pretty uninitiated when it comes to RPM packaging conventions. So the whole thing looks good then. -- "I don't normally do acked-by's. I think it's my way of avoiding getting blamed when it all blows up." Andrew Morton _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_openvswitch.org
