Hi Michael, -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Von: Michael Meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > So far, apparently my mail didn't hit 'discuss' (moderated ?), and got > only a single reply from Cor on the council list. Sorry for not picking up your mail until now. In general I agree, that the election model for the couciul members should change. We have several problems with the current model (problems to find electable candidates who have time to take the work at the council seriously is only one). The council in it's current structure seems very centralistic to me (it's almost built around the project leads). Anyway - it would need time to discuss some rules who should be eligible. An we surely should discuss this. But next council elections are overdue, for more than a year now (if not two). So we really should go on with new elections. > > I can't believe the astonishing apathy is a ringing endorsement of the > existing structure or community, but perhaps a scepticism that anything > will ever change and/or that discussion is even worthwhile :-) Hmm ... no. I rather think, the interest in the councils work is rather low within the community. I still think, that the work of the council is not very effective - but this indeed not what the council is thinking. André -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
