IIRC (at the time of writing that code, in 2005), OS/2 has had problems getting a newer version of gcc, too.
regards, Daniel Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Eike Rathke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Given the define kludges needed there for gcc3.3 I wonder whether that >> is really a helper ;-) >> > Heh! ;-) > > Yeah, admittedly, doesn't look nice - btw, anybody aware of a platform > that still uses 3.3 (apart from panther - and what's the state > there?). > > Cheers, > > -- Thorsten > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
