Forwarded from pr...@apache.org. If responding, please respond to the original sender.
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Travis Newton <tnewt...@gmail.com> Date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:26 AM Subject: Apache OpenOffice To: <pr...@apache.org> Dear Apache Software Foundation, I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to inquire about the ongoing development and distribution of Apache OpenOffice, given its slow development cycle, multiple outstanding security vulnerabilities, and the clear momentum of LibreOffice as the primary successor to OpenOffice.org. As someone who was part of the OpenOffice.org community in 2004 to 2009, I have a deep appreciation for what the project represented. OpenOffice.org was a groundbreaking effort in bringing free and open source office software to users worldwide. It was a powerful alternative to proprietary office suites, and its impact on open source adoption was undeniable. I was actually able to bring OpenOffice.org into my school system when we were faced with financial challenges of obtaining additional Microsoft Office licenses. The brand itself carries a great deal of history and nostalgia for many of us who were involved. However, it is difficult to see OpenOffice.org in its current state, where its lack of active development makes it increasingly obsolete and potentially unsafe for users who may not be aware of its stagnation. The reality is that LibreOffice, as a fork of OpenOffice.org, has become the clear successor with an active community, frequent releases, and strong security practices. For the benefit of open source users, it seems time to consider the best path forward for the OpenOffice.org name and legacy. As the Apache Software Foundation holds the trademarks for OpenOffice.org, I wonder if there have been any discussions about how they could be used to honor the project’s history while guiding users toward an actively maintained alternative. Whether through formally memorializing OpenOffice.org’s contributions or even transferring the trademarks to The Document Foundation, such a step could ensure that users are not left with an outdated and insecure option when better alternatives exist. I write this not as a criticism but out of genuine appreciation for the work that has gone into OpenOffice.org over the years. It is not easy to let go of something that has been so significant, but sometimes the best way to honor a legacy is to ensure it is remembered fondly rather than prolonged beyond its relevance. I would love to hear your thoughts on this matter and whether the ASF has considered any options for OpenOffice.org’s future in light of these concerns. Thank you for your time and for all the work the ASF does in supporting open source software. Best regards, Travis Newton Brian Proffitt VP, Marketing & Publicity VP, Conferences
