On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:13 PM Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On 28.12.20 13:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Playing devil's advocate here: does it make sense to actually post a blog
> > article about this and then, maybe a week later, have the article
> > moot with the actual release?
>
> Yes I think it is worth it and we should train to do such things more
> often.
>
> First of all we prepare our community on the patch. It will be the first
> time that we tell them what we did and why.
>
> The second benefitial point is we will set a expectation. Currently it
> is still fuzzy one, but people will be looking for an update more
> frequently, so if we deliver a week later that would be awesome.
>
> On third:  In the blogpost is we invite for testing. So maybe m,ore
> people will show up to look at the Release Candidate.
>
> My last pro argument is we need also to link other channels to the blog
> post. On facebook it takes some days untill a post reaches the people.
>
> So in case we extend the range it would be great. Just as a reminder, we
> usually do not say anything, and people are used that the dev team works
> more behind the scene.
>

One more "pro" reason is SEO. By creating a blog post about the issue -
preferably quoting the error message the user sees as that's what they are
likely to type into the search box - search engines are more likely to
direct users to the project's explanation than to other locations.

S.

Reply via email to