On 07.12.20 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 7, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
On 07.12.20 20:48, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base
Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB (BSD).
There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2 (EPL1 or MPL2)
and Apache Derby (AL2).
Something like SQLLite (PublicDomain) could be technical interesting, but I
think their licensing is not so appealing.
Is EPL1/MPL2 more appealing than SQLite's PD?
No not really. I am intimidated by the statements:
Open-Source, not Open-Contribution
SQLite is open-source, meaning that you can make as many copies of
it as you want and do whatever you want with those copies, without
limitation. But SQLite is not open-contribution. In order to keep
SQLite in the public domain and ensure that the code does not become
contaminated with proprietary or licensed content, the project does
not accept patches from unknown persons.
All of the code in SQLite is original, having been written
specifically for use by SQLite. No code has been copied from unknown
sources on the internet.
Contributed Code
In order to keep SQLite completely free and unencumbered by
copyright, the project does not accept patches. If you would like to
make a suggested change, and include a patch as a proof-of-concept,
that would be great. However please do not be offended if we rewrite
your patch from scratch.
Actually their Licensing is:
Anyone is free to copy, modify, publish, use, compile, sell, or
distribute the original SQLite code, either in source code form or
as a compiled binary, for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial,
and by any means.
Which is fine and works for us.
Also, let's look at https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
Works in the public domain (or covered by a license treated similarly) may be
included within Apache products. Attribution is required (in a similar fashion
to the Category A list.
A work should be treated as being in the public domain when one of the
following applies:
the work is covered by
the Creative Commons Public Domain Mark
<http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/>, or
a suitable dedication (to the public domain) by the authors; or
I think we can confidently affirm the 2nd bullet.
thanks Jim. I was not that sure about this point.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
