> -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 10:51 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8 released > > Am 11.11.20 um 08:49 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 12:34 AM > >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > >> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8 released > >> > >> 10 November 2020 - Apache OpenOffice, the leading Open > Source office > >> document productivity suite, announced today Apache > OpenOffice 4.1.8, > >> now available in 41 languages on Windows, macOS and Linux. > >> [...] > > > > I think it is absolutely obvious that version 4.1.8 is an > update (and not an upgrade). > > I don't understand why this is wrongly labeled in the > announcement as well as in the release notes. > > a new release within the 4.1.x release branch cannot be big by > definition of the version schema. So, so using the word > "upgrade" is not > wrong. This is my opinion. > > And to be honest, I don't see a problem here. The difference > of meaning > between "update" and "upgrade" is not really big.
Good release notes, as well as good documentation and much more are a necessary part of good software. Why is it once again seemingly more important to reject criticism than to take it up and consider it for the future? I'm sorry Marcus, it's just this climate in the community that has kept me from working more intensively for a long time. > Feel free to use the respective wording in the German version. :-) yes, I had already done that Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
