On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: > On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It looks like we are getting closer.... I mean, we have a commit that >>>> is only relevant to CentOS 5 and we know that Jim's builds are done >>>> on CentOS 5 and have the bug, while the others (mine on CentOS 7; >>>> Pedro's on Ubuntu 18) do not have it. >>>> >>>> Possibly some build error that goes unnoticed due to a "dirty" build? >>>> Otherwise I can't explain why Don's CentOS 5 tests passed... >>>> >>> >>> I don't think anyone else tested Don's CentOS5 built builds... just >>> himself. I think. >> >> I only tested my CentOS 5 build on CentOS 5. I think the problem only >> occurs when running a CentOS 5 build on something newer (Ubuntu only?). >> This sort of smells like a system library incompatability of some sort. >> Things work when the build is done using the system headers that match >> the destination environment, but the problem crops up if the build is >> done with the CentOS 5 headers but the runtime libraries are from a >> newer distro. The mystery is what changed between 4.1.7 and now to >> trigger the problem. > > I only have a 32-bit CentOS 5 VM. My bare-metal Debian stretch machine > is 64 bits, so I wasn't able to test the CentOS 5 build on Debian. > > If I take the output from the 32-bit CentOS 5 build on a 32-bit Ubuntu > 16 VM, I can reproduce the problem. I'm currently building the same git > revision on Ubuntu 16. I suspect that I won't see the problem with that > combo.
If I build the same git revision of AOO418 on Ubuntu 16, then install and run it there, I do *not* see the General Error problem. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
