Hi - > On Oct 19, 2020, at 2:06 PM, Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote: > > I am not sure what you mean.
I am for eliminating all both google analytics and entourage js from our pages as we move. > > Am 19.10.20 um 22:14 schrieb Dave Fisher: >> OK. It would be good to see if we have similar statistics in google >> analytics. > > I do not see any download figures in Google Analytics. Long story short. > > To my interpretation most users (99%) do not use our download page. > > How can a Google Script get the numbers that comparable to the SF.net > download numbers if the web site is not used? > > Which are (to my knowledge) calculated from their logs. > >> >> Two reasons. > > What is with YAGNI? > > Is now downloading from Infra a thing or still a fallback? >> (1) What if we activate an alternative or replacement mirror system. I’ve >> asked Infra and it’s not impossible ask mirror operators. What’s needed is >> partially implemented. >> >> (2) Alternatively if we are going to turn this off then we could find >> another way to count. > > If we start fixing stuff around google analytics, do we really need to use > Google? What about OpenSource solution, like Open-Web-Analytics or AWStats? We can make a special web request and get a filtered apache access log from Infra. Regards, Dave > > (Others like Countly, Plausible and Motomo are services that cost money. And > they do not come cheap (for numbers we do not use) > > This will not solve our number crunching. But we could load the data from > SF.net and add it to other / our sources. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
