I am not sure. What is fine? Maybe summary of the topics and highlight arguments?
We would discuss on the German list what are those central points. Then translate the position paper through deepL and send it to this list. However I am personally also fine with the mail as is. Am 7. Februar 2020 19:57:06 MEZ schrieb "Jörg Schmidt" <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de>: >Hello, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] >> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2020 7:14 PM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: RE: How our project recently works >> >> I do mean that dev needs to be informed on discussions on dev-de. > >Okay, I understand. > >Is there anything _currently_ needed to be done, or was Michael's email >already the summary you wanted? > > >One more question: > >I generally assume that results of a discussion on de-dev are _not_ >binding/valid for dev. > >Is that how everyone here sees it? Or is it controversial and needs >clarification? > > > >Jörg > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
