Hello everybody, 

I am not speaking for the PMC, but for myself and from my personal view. 
I joined the Project in 2016. It has been my became Chairman in end of 2017. As 
unexperienced as I have been it was the best move for me to go into. 
It have been an exiting and educating 2 year period as Chairman. Since the PMC 
has decided we want to change the chair on regular bases and often I fought for 
my availability until very late in this year.
But now I am relieved that I can relax a little from the mails. 

 I announced early on private to give everyone on the PMC enough time to think 
his or her availability through. After all it is a free choice to stand up for 
this. 

The Chairman is in my eyes a sort of envoy between 
ASF and PMC. I would not make much of a Fuzz about the change. This is less 
important then the title implies. 
I hope we can convince someone else to step up for 2021. Maybe again a fresh 
face from the none ASF Members on the PMC. That would be super cool. 

I want to focus next year my time more on project building topics and on 
development. So this is not to be seen as a stepping down. I would title it 
more as a position shift. And I am very happy to know Jim will be on the watch 
@board. I have no doubts that Jim is a good choice. 

I hope this extensive comment is helping everyone. If you have more I am happy 
to answer them here on @dev. Just have some patience since due to the shift I 
will maybe slower on answers. 


Have fun
Peter

Am 22. November 2019 10:47:46 MEZ schrieb Simon Phipps <webm...@apache.org>:
>On Thu, 21 Nov 2019, 21:48 Patricia Shanahan, <p...@acm.org> wrote:
>
>> One of the resolutions passed at the last board meeting was:
>>
>> "Change the Apache OpenOffice Project Chair (Jim Jagielski, VP)"
>>
>> Jim,
>>
>> I don't know whether congratulation or commiseration is more
>> appropriate, so you get whichever you prefer from me.
>>
>
>Likewise!
>
>I'm slightly surprised this was decided in September but only just
>became
>public. Can the PMC comment please?
>
>S.
>
>>

Reply via email to