> On Aug 26, 2019, at 11:22 AM, Matthias Seidel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 26.08.19 um 14:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> >>> On Aug 24, 2019, at 12:07 PM, Matthias Seidel <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have created an empty directory structure for AOO 4.1.7 RC1: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.7-RC1/ >>> >>> This is just in advance... >>> >>> But thinking about it: >>> We create a source build at the end of our release process. >>> Since we switched to Git now and the source build name does contain the >>> revision number, we should make sure it still works as expected. >>> >>> @Jim: Can you try to do a source build (I think you did it on macOS)? >>> >> The build results in: >> <aoo-builder64-macos13:main/instsetoo_native/unxmaccx.pro> % cd >> AOO_SRC_Release >> <aoo-builder64-macos13:instsetoo_native/unxmaccx.pro/AOO_SRC_Release> % ls >> apache-openoffice-4.1.7-raf1b3ff97e-src.tar >> apache-openoffice-4.1.7-raf1b3ff97e-src.tar.gz >> apache-openoffice-4.1.7-raf1b3ff97e-src.tar.bz2 >> apache-openoffice-4.1.7-raf1b3ff97e-src.zip > So, basically it works... Good news! >> >> Do we still want the '-r' part of the name? Before, the 'r' stood for (SVN) >> revision. The git short hash is af1b3ff97e > We kept the "Rev." in the About dialog, but here the "r" looks misplaces > like it would be part of the hash. >
Yeah, that's the concern. > I would be for removing it and only keep the git hash. +1. I'll make the change. > > Regards, > > Matthias
