On 22/01/2019 20:08, Marcus wrote:
Am 22.01.19 um 20:00 schrieb Mechtilde:
And wie should use the same system for buildbots and for the release
build server.
To make all build servers equal and comparable is a real advantage in
case of problems we need to reproduce.
I also think that CentOS 7 is surely better than an old Fedora release
for building. Fedora 19 is 10 releases back with respect to the current
one, and abandoned in terms of maintenance.
Since the reason for the idea is that CentOS has better 32-bit support,
I'll admit that I've never used with some continuity a 32-bit Linux
system recently, so I'm not in a position to compare 32-bit CentOS to
32-bit Fedora.
But I would also consider some refocusing for 4.2.0. Since 32-bit Linux
users are a small fraction of a small fraction I would totally be in
favor of a simplified offering on our side, like providing only one
multi-language build in archive format (no RPM, no DEB) for 32-bit
Linux. If Fedora 19 (only for this 32-bit build) makes this easier, I
wouldn't object. And I would keep using CentOS 7 64-bit for all our
64-bit Linux builds.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
