I agree that the focus should be on 4.2.0. However, I strongly favor
having a ready-to-go 4.1.7. Any day, we could encounter a really
serious, must-fix-immediately, security bug. Having as much as possible
done ahead of time will reduce the delay from knowing the fix to end
users having the fix.
On 1/21/2019 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Gotcha. I was just thinking that if we had a 4.1.7 branch in a ready-to-go
stage, if we needed to do another 4.1.x release it would be already there.
But agree that the focus should be on 4.2.0
On Jan 21, 2019, at 11:25 AM, Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:12:12 -0500
Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
Does it make sense to create a branch of 4.1.7 from 4.1.6...?
No, unless for some urgent fix. I think better to continue with 4.2.0, then on
to 5.0
4.2.0 editing OK in Writer (60k word file, book format, no
illustrations/tables). A simple spreadsheet working OK; existing Impress
presentations displaying, apart from two where slide backgrounds cause crash.
Multimedia in new presentations not yet checked.
--
Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
