+1 to this plan. On 09.01.19 20:10, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> On Jan 9, 2019, at 1:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 09.01.19 um 18:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Trunk has been branched off to the (eventual) release branch >>> for the AOO 4.2.x series. The branch is: >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO42X >> Great, but why is it called 42X? Wouldn't 420 be better? > The reason is that when it's time to release 4.2.0, we work on 42X until we > have it ready. once done, we then tag AOO420 from 42X. That is, the 42X > branch will always be the eventual branch for a 4.2.x release. All backports > from trunk are done to that branch. > > Make sense? > >> The reason I ask is because I wanted to adjust the links for the update >> feed... >> >>> Development can, and should, continue on trunk, but ONLY >>> approved backports should be applied to AOO42X. >> Now trunk (aka 420) needs a new internal version number. >> What about 450? >> > Works for me :) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
