Hi Marcus,

Am 17.11.18 um 10:10 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 14.11.18 um 00:09 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 13.11.18 um 08:04 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> Release is now in the svn branch.
>>>
>>> I remove tonight the 4.1.5 release, any objections?
>>>
>>> So how much time do we need? is release date 16th November feasable?
>>
>> if there is no good reason against it, I would move this always to
>> the weekend, as I think the most people can spend more time for a
>> release than within the week with 1-2 hours in the evening.
>>
>> So, Saturday (btw, which time?) would fit better - at least for me
>> for the download website.
>
> what about the release now? Is it ready for offering on the download
> webpage?

As long as it concerns SourceForge, everything is uploaded in a staged
directory.

Maybe you want to have a look, as I did that for the first time...

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Thanks
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>>> On 13.11.18 01:30, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>> Andrea,
>>>>
>>>> I am just saying a 4.1.7 release has nothing to do with the efforts we
>>>> have to organize for 4.2.0.
>>>>
>>>> I hope I upload now into the right place, but I have initiated the
>>>> task.
>>>>
>>>> All the best
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> On 13.11.18 00:48, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>>> Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>>>> I do not see your issue. Our release team works much faster then
>>>>>> the dev
>>>>>> team progresses on 4.2.0.
>>>>> There is a major difference between a 4.1.x and a new release like
>>>>> 4.2.0: for 4.2.0 we need the entire community, not only what you call
>>>>> the "release team" and developers (read: localization efforts,
>>>>> organized QA efforts, a possible public beta, a baseline update...).
>>>>> If you believe that 4.2.0 is only for developers you are
>>>>> underestimating the task.
>>>>>
>>>>>> A 4.1.7 will keep the routine and knowledge active while we develop
>>>>>> 4.2.0.
>>>>> We have many millions of users. We must provide some value with a
>>>>> release. This meant waiting 11 months (and counting) between 4.1.5
>>>>> and
>>>>> 4.1.6; if 4.1.6 has no major regressions, we can surely wait some
>>>>> months before considering a 4.1.7 (again, in a non-emergency
>>>>> situation).
>>>>>
>>>>> But I would really like that we stop talking about this virtual 4.1.7
>>>>> release and actually release 4.1.6 for real.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to