Keith N. McKenna wrote:
In his second vote announcement Peter also specified that to cast a
non-binding vote one still had to download and compile the source on
ones own machine and then test that binary. This is far over and above
anything that has ever been required for a non-binding vote.

Whether a vote is binding or not depends entirely on the role: due to legal issues, votes from PMC members are (always) "binding", meaning that they are counted separately, even though everyone is welcome to vote.

We need to have on record at least three PMC members who built from source and tested for the vote to be considered valid. The threshold of three is a hard requirement.

While building would be required of other people too, we've historically not been very rigid on this, provided that voters in general, so both PMC members and people from the community at large, simply write (a subset of) what they did.

Summarizing:

- If you, PMC member or not, feel that the release is good enough, please do vote and say something "+1; I tested the Italian version on MacOS, opened ODF and .docx files, everything was OK" and nobody will ask you whether you built from source or not; this is very valuable feedback as we would have very limited platform/language coverage otherwise.

- In order to close the vote successfully, at least 3 PMC members must explicitly write in their statement that they built from source and tested their own builds. This ensures we meet the minimum requirements.

Regards,
  Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to