Am 02.11.2018 um 00:00 schrieb Pedro Lino:
Please can you check it with the board-tools of Ubuntu? I think you also
should have sha256sum and sha512sum as commands.
It does work for the src file with sha512sum so Double Commander is less versatile. But
wouldn't it make sense to keep the two SHA files similar (i.e. <checksum_value>
*<filename>?
Actually there is a bigger problem with the SHA512 files for _all_ the binaries
in the RC1 folder: they include the folder name
Example
SHA512(./en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz)=
c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb
Should be
SHA512(./Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz)=
c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb
Or even easier
c8caa278fd881be393ad2905ef1c89d5e96710ab4d758c254102b2f9f6fbca21ad9bfba8ef375b13b3d982da0627d195ac40dbd9e7aa10c780b6d2ea6891bcfb
*Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
AFAIK the data is created by a script. I haven't checked, so it's
possible that the way of creation is different for both. Or that they
are done by 2 different persons.
It would be indeed better to have all check sums in the same style.
Is it possible to do this before we have the release?
Thanks
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
