Hi Andrea, Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> How about this one: >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736 >> It fixes a typo in the build process. > > This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a > maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it wouldn't > make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk and > (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I understand > if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection. > > In general, release blockers should be: > - important bugfixes for users > - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler) > - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a newer > Windows release... just an example)
This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-) It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that would finally find its way into a release. There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"... Regards, Matthias > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
