The above made it appear that Ant 1.9.x was no longer supported plus had some sort of security related issue making it unsuited for AOO... ie, we *needed* to use Ant 1.10 not just that we now *can* use it.
How about showing some sympathy and understanding for those who may be stuck w/ older machines? After all, let's be real, our continued support for "older" systems is the only real thing we have going for us... It's these little things that make significant ripples in our eco-system and we seem to not really care about that anymore. > On Jul 3, 2018, at 4:02 PM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > Am 03.07.2018 um 21:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> >>> On Jul 1, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi everbody. >>> >>> >>> I would like to bring a 4.1.6 Release on the way in July. Even if we manage >>> to get 4.2.0 ready it will only be a beta. And we have some stuff to get >>> out to the people. >>> >>> Matthias has created a suggestion for a 4.1.6 release on security. >>> Containing some security fixes, plus >>> >>> >>> - Java 8 Update 172 >>> - Apache Ant 1.10.3 >> What is wrong w/ Apache Ant 1.9.12? Why the need for 1.10.x? > > What is wrong with Ant 1.10.x? If we build with Java 8 we can use it... ;-) > My test build was just a Proof-of-Concept what can be done with AOO 4.1.x. > > But of course we can build with 1.9.x if that is wanted? > > Regards, > Matthias > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
