Am 04.04.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> On Apr 4, 2018, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >> >> I will start another thread on the gbuild topic... >> > First and foremost, I am incredibly impressed with the work > being done on the gbuild migration. I really am. > > However, and there's always a "however", there must come > a time where we "hold the line" on migration in hopes of getting > a 4.2.0 out. As such, I think some sort of plan might be due > (and apologies if we have such a documented plan already > in place)...
I don't know if there is already a plan, but what about voting for a release manager and get the thing going? Regards, Matthias > Does it make sense to spend time to list modules that still > need that migration and then prioritize them? As well as > create a policy such that all "new and updated" modules > must use gbuild but for existing modules, "if it ain't broke, > don't fix it"? > > I'm not trying to stifle the migration, it's just that it appears > to me that we need better management about it. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
