I had to build with -std=c++11 on gcc 7. C++98 did not work as far as I remeber. C++17 did lead also to failure I believe.
So I think we use features from the partial support already. Am 26. März 2018 03:03:56 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org>: >On 25 Mar, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> What version of the C++ standard should we code to? > >At least for now, C++ 98. The version of gcc in CentOS 6 only has >partial support for C++ 0x. > >Our Windows build instructions currently recommend a 2007 version of >the >compiler and libraries, which predate the 2011 standard. > >> For example, can the move to STL use features that were added in C++ >11? > >These may be available via boost. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
