Damjan, you forgot to post the patch on the thread. Peter Kovacs asked for a copy and I'm not sure if he's rec'd it.
> On Mar 20, 2018, at 3:24 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote: > > Does nobody understand, that with that run-time dynamic linking patch I > wrote, and some extra work to resurrect gstreamer 0.1 support from SVN, you > could build both gstreamer 0.1 and 1.0 plugins on CentOS 6, and then use > whichever gstreamer version is installed at run-time? > > Damjan > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:34 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > >> Does it make sense to have both gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 as exclusive >> options. >> That is, enabling gstreamer during the build will determine what >> version is supported and then use that? >> >> ie, sort of merge how AOO415 and AOO420 currently do things related >> to gstreamer? >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org