The more I think about it, I agree that deprecating CentOS5 for 4.2.x is the
Right Way To Go.

I plan on creating 2 CentOS6 VMs this weekend: one 64 and the other 32bit.
I'll put the CentOS5 VMs "on storage" for 4.1.x.

> On Nov 24, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> CentOS 5 is now EOL, even its maintenance updates ended on 31 March 2017. I
> think we have to move to CentOS 6.
> 
> I made GIO the default VFS searched by configure instead of GnomeVFS, as
> that's what everybody has been using for years; AOO is pretty much the only
> application still pulling in that ancient package with who knows what
> security issues. It was done in this commit:
> 
> r1812655 | damjan | 2017-10-19 18:35:49 +0200 (Thu, 19 Oct 2017) | 6 lines
> Changed paths:
>   M /openoffice/trunk/main/configure.ac
> 
> GnomeVFS was deprecated 9 years ago. Make GIO, its replacement,
> the default searched by configure.ac instead.
> 
> ----
> 
> If we really need GnomeVFS back, we can revert that commit, or use
> ./configure switches to favor GnomeVFS over GIO.
> 
> Damjan
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> 
>> True, but not ALL dependencies... for example, we require egrep :)
>> 
>> But Zip 3.0.0 is one specifically checked for:
>> 
>>> dnl ===================================================================
>>> dnl Zip must be available or else it is an error, all platforms
>>> dnl ===================================================================
>>> if test -z "$ZIP" -o -z "$UNZIP"; then
>>>    AC_MSG_ERROR([Zip/Unzip are required to build, please install or use
>> --with-zip-home],,)
>>> fi
>>> if "$ZIP" -FS < /dev/null 2>&1 | $EGREP "no such option: S" > /dev/null;
>> then
>>>    AC_MSG_ERROR([Zip version 3.0 or newer is required to build, please
>> install or use --with-zip-home],,)
>>> fi
>>> 
>> 
>> It does look like all previous builds, up to and including 4.1.4 were done
>> on
>> CentOS5 (for the released binaries).
>> 
>> So the question is that w/ 4.2.0, do we no longer support CentOS 5 as a
>> supported build platform. Another dependency seems to be GIO, but we
>> can build w/o that. But is that really an option for our community builds??
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 24, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I thought we add all dependencies to the build process. (thats why our
>> build takes ages.)
>>> I thought the only distibution dependency is the build environment.
>>> Maybe I am wrong. If so I do not understand how CentOS5 can be
>> compatible to everything else.
>>> 
>>> On 24.11.2017 16:23, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 23, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Matthias Seidel <
>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Rory,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am 23.11.2017 um 18:31 schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
>>>>>> I have downloaded and install AO0 4.2.0 for linux from
>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/
>> linux64/Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-
>> US_2017-11-23_04%3A16%3A31_1816101.tar.gz
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> When opening a Writer file from the splash screen I get a "general
>> error" message, then the file opens.  Starting AOO 4.2.0 from a terminal
>> gives the message
>>>>>> ** (soffice:2353): WARNING **: Unknown type: GailWindow
>>>>>> The file then opens; it will accept a simple edit, and close
>> correctly.
>>>>> That sounds like this issue:
>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127315
>>>>> 
>>>>> It would be interesting if it only affects builds based on Ubuntu
>>>>> (14.04). Can someone build 4.2.0 on CentOS under release conditions?
>>>>> 
>>>> Question: Is CentOS 5 still our preferred version, or should we
>> deprecate
>>>> CentOS5 for CentOS 6?
>>>> 
>>>> There are some things that 4.2.0 requires requires some updated 3rd
>> party
>>>> libs, like zip 3.0.0 or later, etc.
>>>> 
>>>> If I had to vote, I'd say w/ assume (and stay w/) CentOS 5 since the
>> upgrade to
>>>> CentOS 6 will likely cause a lot of potential for regressions.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to