+1 in the release First Switch After. Am 15. September 2017 04:51:29 MESZ schrieb Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: >We must not block 4.1.4. We must release soon. > >Regards, >Dave > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 7:36 PM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> >wrote: >> >> The process is, we vote, then get Infra to switch us. >> >> Many big and small Apache projects have switched to Git, eg. Apache >Commons. >> >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> >wrote: >>> >>> I would like to add one more condition: We should not move until the >>> process we will use has been applied successfully to smaller >projects. >>> >>> I am relatively neutral on the choice of repository, and a lot of >people >>> seem to like Git. >>> >>> >>>> On 9/14/2017 11:16 AM, Marcus wrote: >>>> >>>> Even when I'm not a real developer, please let me add some points: >>>> >>>> IMHO we could switch when >>>> >>>> - ASF Infra can and will support it >>>> - the CMS (it manages the webpages) is supporting Git >>>> - the big majority of us is wanting Git >>>> - it is known how and save that the SVN commit history can be >migrated >>>> to Git >>>> >>>> PS: >>>> As Apache project the code has to be at the ASF. I think it's not >>>> possible to store it somewhere else like, e.g., GitHub. >>>> >>>> Marcus >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Am 14.09.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 14.09.2017 13:10, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's >>>>>> source? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge >nowdays, >>>>>> by >>>>>> far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know >and >>>>>> IDEs >>>>>> support >(https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). >>>>>> It >>>>>> would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting >offline, >>>>>> git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large >projects, >>>>>> it >>>>>> would integrate with GitHub better, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do people think? >>>>>> >>>>>> Damjan >>>>>> >>>>>> As much as I prefer GIT for Codemaintenance, I think the central >REPO >>>>> should be maintained by Apache Infra. >>>>> If Infra can move to git, fine. If they do not support it, it is >also >>>>> fine to me. >>>>> >>>>> I am at -1 to have our official REPO on GITHUB or another service >>>>> provider. >>>>> >>>>> And I am not sure if we can not work around the problem to commit >to SVN >>>>> from a GIT repo. >>>>> Have to check. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> All the best >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
